Warning: Declaration of TarskiCommentWalker::start_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /var/www/snigel.nu/public_html/wp-content/themes/tarski/library/classes/comment_walker.php on line 22 Warning: Declaration of TarskiCommentWalker::start_el(&$output, $comment, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_el(&$output, $comment, $depth = 0, $args = Array, $id = 0) in /var/www/snigel.nu/public_html/wp-content/themes/tarski/library/classes/comment_walker.php on line 50 Olle Linge - Languages, literature and the pursuit of dreams · Long novels

Long novels

You are currently browsing articles tagged Long novels.

Those of you who have followed my reviews over the years, know that I am inclined to dislike long books. In fact, I have gone so far as to state that authors who use more pages than necessary are incompetent. If this is true for long novels, it is even more so for series of books, which have even lower chances of winning my approval. In my experience, this is a somewhat idiosyncratic idea not shared by a majority of readers. Since I am often misunderstood in my zealous crusade against the plague of wordy novels, I intend to explain how I feel and why. I do not intend to win anybody over to my side, I only want to explain my point of view once and for all.

Reasons for reading
To begin with, I want to state that I do not read book to relax or to kill time; I have way too many other things that fulfill those needs. Time spent on reading is often high-quality time in that, if desired, it could have been used to do almost anything else. Therefore, I want more out of reading than procrastination and escapism.

Primarily, I read because I like to enjoy ideas which I could not have come up with myself. Ideas can be of almost any nature (characters, setting, plot or whatever), so this is not a very delimiting statement. The reason I bring it up is because it is the most important thing to me, more important than the author’s use of language, for instance. Development of characters and plot is also part of this, since I tend to like it if it is original. In other words, I do not care very much for well-portrayed character development if I have seen something similar before.

It should be at least theoretically possible to quantify the ideas in a text. Even if it is practically impossible and not even desirable, let us at least assume that we can assign a highly subjective number to the amount of good ideas in a certain book. I do not care about defining the terms or specifying a procedure of counting; this is a purely abstract method to explain my point of view. A lot of problems would arise, like how to count good ideas which require much space, for instance. However, let us assume that the good ideas can be quantified.

A question of time
There is a virtually unlimited abundance of good books in the world and realising that it is of course impossible to read all of them, time becomes an important factor. This means that it is not the number of good ideas in a certain book that is important, instead, it is the number of good ideas per time. Since reading time is very subjective, let us call it ideas per page instead.

Following this line of thought, I conclude that some books are better than others, because they contain more good things per page. Let me illustrate with an example. If a given book contains X good things and is 250 pages long, and another book also contains X good things, but is 1000 pages long, I will, without hesitation, regard the latter one as hideously much worse. It feels a bit like diluting juice extract with twice as much water as prescribed; it contains the same amount of flavour, but thinned out.

Why do I dislike this? Because it is a waste of my time. If I read a book (Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norell by Susanna Clarke comes to mind) and have the feeling that the positive aspects of that book could have been fitted into half the number of pages, it would have made me angry if I would have been the sort of person inclined to getting angry at all (which I am not). Instead of reading that particular book, I could have spent the time reading something else, giving me perhaps twice as much pleasure in the same span of time.

In fact, I do not dislike long novels
The time has come to contradict the title of this article. In fact, I do not dislike long books. I hate ineffective ones which use more pages than necessary, though. I am aware of the fact that this is grossly unfair, since what I perceive as interesting might not at all be in line with that which the author intended.

However, long novels and series of books tend to be less dense when it comes to good things per page compared to shorter novels, which leads to, that in practice, I often do hate long books, even though there are many exceptions (Dune by Frank Herbert). There are even series I like (Gap by Stephen R. Donaldson), albeit that they are few in number and ofter come short of being perfect because they are, surprise, too long.

After all, some ideas require a lot of text to work properly, so in certain cases, long novels can be excused. My aversion to long novels is therefore a bit categorical, but it saves a lot of time.

I hope that I have explained why I tend to dislike long novels. As I said initially, it is not my intention to stop anyone from reading long books, joining the dark side or anything, but since my dislike has been increasing over the past few years, I feel that I need to have an article published so as to have something to refer to instead of using makeshift arguments in the heat of the moment. By way of hypocritical conclusion, I will now continue reading John Brunner’s Stand on Zanzibar, which is rough 650 pages long.

Tags: ,